We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Tintri VMstore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."The product is easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature is the tool's cheap cost."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share folders and run Active Directory."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a highly scalable solution."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes."
"The performance and scalability offered by the tool meet our company's expectations."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is stable."
"The ease and use and the great performance are why we went with our 2nd Tintri VMstore."
"Web GUI for maintenance and resource monitoring purposes is easy to use."
"We have been able to scale up to ten VM storages and 500 VMs through a single pane of glass."
"The management dashboards keep improving and allow for quick and easy tracing of issues."
"Performance, cost, and ease of storage management."
"I've worked on both EMC and NetApp SANs, and this is by far the easiest system to maintain"
"The most valuable feature is the VM management."
"You can control resources on a per VM basis to ensure that contention in resources does not hamper performance."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its stability."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."
"The product must reduce the cost by 40%."
"The solution's user interface could be improved."
"The response time from technical support could be faster."
"It would be good if the tool's integration improved."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"I would like to be able to add more storage capacity to our 2 units down the road with out buying an additional seprate array."
"The solution is already good but the brand name is not so popular here."
"Detailed reporting is missing in the current version. We would like to see this feature added in a new release."
"Active/active cluster between two Tintris on Hyper-V cluster."
"The product could be improved by adding iSCSI support. We have had to rethink how we implement some of our services due to this."
"I'm waiting to see the Kubernetes package. I know they're releasing one, but I haven't seen it yet."
"Speed of our VDI machines. We have a very high log in and log out ratio and machines are being refreshed instantly so we have a constant boot storm on our storage."
"More cloud integration."
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 31 reviews while Tintri VMstore is ranked 15th in All-Flash Storage with 61 reviews. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Tintri VMstore is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Has a good interface but needs to improve in areas like pricing and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore writes "We were able to push a button—it really is that simple—and flip primary and secondary storage locations". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Tintri VMstore is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, HPE Nimble Storage, VMware vSAN and NetApp AFF.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.