We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Tintri VMstore T7000 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."The dashboard is valuable to us."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is stable."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool is perfectly stable."
"The most valuable feature is the tool's cheap cost."
"The solution is good at allowing end users to connect anytime and anywhere."
"Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share folders and run Active Directory."
"Upgrades are super easy and can be done during business hours without interruptions in production."
"I like Tintri's Global Admin feature and the solution's performance. It's incredibly fast storage, which was a significant upgrade for us when we deployed it seven years ago. The Tintri snapshots are brilliant and incredibly reliable."
"We love the real-time replication, ease of use when connecting our servers to the storage, and the level of redundancy inside the box... It's also simple software and integrates well with VMware so we get a lot of information about all of the VMs, how they're performing individually, and about network latency. That's very helpful when you're troubleshooting a slowdown."
"We have been able to scale up to ten VM storages and 500 VMs through a single pane of glass."
"The management dashboards keep improving and allow for quick and easy tracing of issues."
"You can control resources on a per VM basis to ensure that contention in resources does not hamper performance."
"The most valuable feature is the VM management."
"A very good support team that is available 24/7. They have real technical staff with strong knowledge."
"The interface should be improved."
"Microsoft Virtual Server's cost was an area of concern...I feel Microsoft Virtual Server will be stopped in a couple of months or a couple of years, and it will be completely replaced with SQL Server data warehouse and Microsoft Fabric."
"While I am generally satisfied with the solution, it could slightly improve its stability."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."
"The platform could provide more integration and stability."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its stability."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The security performance and cost."
"Technical support is an area where we had several issues, and it was hard to get some support in a specific case we had. I'm not very satisfied with them."
"I would like it to have the ability to store data other than virtual machines. At the moment, you can only connect VMs to it, and that’s a bit disappointing."
"The Tintri OS and GlobalCenter software do a great job of showing you troubled VMs, however it still could be a bit more helpful in diagnosing the issues."
"Their current replication is really just enough to "check the box" that they do replication. We'll probably implement Actifio, Zerto or EMC RecoverPoint for VMs for more critical data replication."
"The Tintri Analytics site is excellent for long-term trending, but more data would be great."
"More cloud integration."
"The product could be improved by adding iSCSI support. We have had to rethink how we implement some of our services due to this."
"The biggest area for improvement, and there has been some roadmap work in this area already, is cloud integration... Tintri has been investing in this area and I'm sure will continue to, but cloud integration has been the biggest area that we've been crossing our fingers and hoping for quick development around."
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 33 reviews while Tintri VMstore T7000 is ranked 14th in All-Flash Storage with 61 reviews. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Tintri VMstore T7000 is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Easy to use but challenges with desktop version and lags ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore T7000 writes "We were able to push a button—it really is that simple—and flip primary and secondary storage locations". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Tintri VMstore T7000 is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, HPE Nimble Storage, VMware vSAN and NetApp AFF.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
