We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Tintri VMstore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."I appreciate the ease and speed with which I can set up and manage virtual machines using Microsoft Virtual Server."
"The solution's performance is good."
"We use the solution for internal business purposes."
"The most valuable features are monitoring, and the self-service that they have for a customized environment."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is stable."
"The dashboard is valuable to us."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share folders and run Active Directory."
"The tool is perfectly stable."
"The ability to snap machines into VMware quickly is valuable."
"We also find the detail per-vm reporting at the ability to see reports from the hypervisor straight back to the storage useful."
"You can control resources on a per VM basis to ensure that contention in resources does not hamper performance."
"Tintri VMstore is rock solid. We have not had a single issue with stability. It is also very low maintenance allowing us to concentrate on project work."
"It’s very good at IOPS."
"The Deduplication feature in VDI environments. If Tintri says we can host 3000 VMs in our storage, I know we can host 3000 VMs there. Believe the results."
"The most valuable feature is the VM management."
"Web GUI for maintenance and resource monitoring purposes is easy to use."
"The security performance and cost."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."
"The pricing and scalability are areas of the product with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Support could always be a bit better."
"The product must reduce the cost by 40%."
"The interface should be improved."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Server security can always be improved."
"Their current replication is really just enough to "check the box" that they do replication. We'll probably implement Actifio, Zerto or EMC RecoverPoint for VMs for more critical data replication."
"Technical support is an area where we had several issues, and it was hard to get some support in a specific case we had. I'm not very satisfied with them."
"The product could be improved by adding iSCSI support. We have had to rethink how we implement some of our services due to this."
"Tintri need to be able to innovate faster but maintain the quality of their features."
"In sync and automated mirror between two Tintris is missing."
"Speed of our VDI machines. We have a very high log in and log out ratio and machines are being refreshed instantly so we have a constant boot storm on our storage."
"The Tintri Analytics site is excellent for long-term trending, but more data would be great."
"Their support staff just doesn't have the experience with all of the products that we're running. They don't know the 850 series like we do because it's five years old. There is a little bit of a gap, and that may just be because we're an old customer running on platforms that their staff hasn't seen. I would like to see an improvement in their in-depth knowledge of their older products."
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 31 reviews while Tintri VMstore is ranked 15th in All-Flash Storage with 61 reviews. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Tintri VMstore is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Has a good interface but needs to improve in areas like pricing and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore writes "We were able to push a button—it really is that simple—and flip primary and secondary storage locations". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Tintri VMstore is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, HPE Nimble Storage, VMware vSAN and NetApp AFF.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
