MongoDB Atlas vs SQL Azure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MongoDB Logo
6,216 views|3,418 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,173 views|5,178 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MongoDB Atlas and SQL Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed MongoDB Atlas vs. SQL Azure Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a good solution for NoSQL databases.""MongoDB Atlas is a database that is quite fast, stable, and reliable.""The product is simple to use and enterprise-ready. It is also open-source.""The most valuable feature of MongoDB Atlas is it's seamless when working with a lot of different systems. Additionally, it is able to adjust the data based on the data being received.""The product is user-friendly.""The solution is easily scalable and manageable. Tools can be easily added to the solution.""It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data.""The cloud-based nature of this solution makes it flexible and scalable."

More MongoDB Atlas Pros →

"The most valuable feature of SQL Azure is the user-friendly VMs.""The solution is efficient and easy to use.""The stability is good.""Its performance is good. It has a lot of features. It has the backup feature, which is not there in Amazon RDS. In Azure SQL, there is an option to replicate and restore a database point to point, whereas we can't do that with Amazon RDS.""I prefer using Microsoft SQL Server because I like the experience and the way Microsoft handles the query tuning and security.""Emergency mode is quite useful.""The product's initial setup phase is very easy.""Its technical support team is good."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"The cost needs improvement.""The UI is not currently designed in a manner to make it possible for a non-technical person or a layman to update the database easily.""The tool's implementation should be made easier.""The UI application for MongoDB crashes a lot, so we would have to use a third-party plugin to make it work.""It would be great if it were easier to integrate MongoDB Atlas with AWS services. Technical support for MongoDB Atlas could be better.""MongoDB Atlas should improve its user experience by providing better explanations or a wizard for people working with its UI.""When I edit a document from a document, a lot of clicking is involved, like changing data type manually from a drop-down. It would be super nice if I could just edit the document in a JSON format. The JSON-based document editor should have a multi-language feature. Also, it would be great if there was a connect option from Google Looker Studio.""The speed when combining two documents is concerning."

More MongoDB Atlas Cons →

"Their support is nice but their responses aren't effective.""I need Microsoft to allow their network to access open source technologies.""The management is entirely controlled by Microsoft, so there are some restrictions.""The product could be more competitive in terms of features, security, and scalability.""It's a little bit limited in terms of functionality.""The way it has been designed, in the on-premises deployments, the underlying Windows OS is highly scalable but has a very large resource requirement. A lot of power-related and memory-related things are there, which I have not seen in the RHEL and Oracle. I have not tried SQL on RHEL EXEC. On Windows, infrastructure-wise, a very large workload is running on the SQL. This issue is related to Windows, not SQL.""There is so much information that it becomes confusing at times. The information can be more friendly. They could also provide additional training, especially at the beginning.""It would help if the solution was more secure."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing and licensing is great."
  • "The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace was very good."
  • "In my previous company, the product allowed use to build a database in a highly regulated environment with the ability to get distributed storage. We used MongoDB as a distributed storage to set up this environment for a critical business application with millions of dollars."
  • "It is too expensive. They need to work on this."
  • "The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing."
  • "Pricing could always be better."
  • "We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."
  • "The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments."
  • More MongoDB Atlas Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most beneficial MongoDB features for our workload are the ability to scale up and down using automatic sharding and clustering.
    Top Answer:The real-time data visible within MongoDB Atlas is not accurate. If they can improve the UI that monitors real-time data. It's more impressive and more attractive. It could be more user-friendly.
    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    6,216
    Comparisons
    3,418
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    473
    Rating
    8.5
    2nd
    Views
    11,173
    Comparisons
    5,178
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Atlas
    Learn More
    Overview

    MongoDB Atlas is a developer data platform that provides a tightly integrated collection of data and application infrastructure building blocks to enable enterprises to quickly deploy bespoke architectures to address any application need. Atlas supports transactional, full-text search, vector search, time series and stream processing application use cases across mobile, distributed, event-driven, and serverless architectures.

    A key advantage of MongoDB Atlas is flexibility - it makes it easy to adjust storage and computing resources on the fly. This scalability ensures optimal performance even for workloads with fluctuating demands, without overprovisioning infrastructure. You only pay for what they use. Atlas also enables deploying globally distributed databases that improve data access speeds and provide built-in redundancy for high availability.

    On the security front, Atlas offers robust encryption, access controls, and complies with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA out-of-the-box. Its real-time analytics and full-text search empower businesses to quickly gain insights from data to drive better decisions. The document-oriented data model is versatile for handling varied data types - ideal for modern applications dealing with unstructured data.

    Additional Atlas capabilities include simplified deployment, built-in disaster recovery, reduced time-to-market and costs, increased agility and scalability. It can power web, mobile, IoT and other applications. With extensive documentation and an active community, getting started with Atlas is straightforward even for lean teams.

    Technical Perspectives:

    • MongoDB Atlas utilizes a document data model, which is intuitive and flexible, allowing faster evolution in response to changing business requirements. This model eliminates the need for expensive JOINs and ORM layers, improving performance and simplifying data handling​​.
    • Traditional relational databases often require complex schema designs and ORM layers, adding to the workload of developers and DBAs. MongoDB Atlas offers a more streamlined approach with its document model, reducing the complexity and improving agility​​.

    Peer Reviews and Practical Insights:

    • The solution is highly rated for its robustness, ease of deployment, and sustainability.
    • Technical support and pricing are areas highlighted for improvement.
    • Comparisons with other database solutions like Microsoft SQL Server suggest that MongoDB Atlas is cost-effective, especially considering enterprise-level offerings​​.
    • Local support and escalation processes are mentioned, indicating a robust support structure for troubleshooting​​.

    In conclusion, MongoDB Atlas presents a versatile and efficient cloud database solution, particularly favored for its managed services, scalability, and security. The platform's ability to adapt to various application requirements, coupled with its intuitive document model, positions it as a strong contender in the cloud database market.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company41%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Healthcare Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    MongoDB Atlas vs. SQL Azure
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB Atlas vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MongoDB Atlas is ranked 3rd in Database as a Service with 42 reviews while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. MongoDB Atlas is rated 8.4, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of MongoDB Atlas writes "Allows our business to analyze social media data with machine learning and store the data in MongoDB". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". MongoDB Atlas is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and IBM Db2 on Cloud. See our MongoDB Atlas vs. SQL Azure report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.