We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."
"We haven't had any issues with stability."
"It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."
"It is easy to set up."
"We find the query and speed very valuable."
"The solution has good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"The dashboard is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required."
"The performance could be faster."
"A normal Oracle or database tester will take some time to gear up to MongoDB because the way of writing queries is different in MongoDB. There should be some kind of midway where a person who is coming from an Oracle background can write a query and get a response by using something like a select * statement or other such things. There should be some way for MongoDB to interpret these commands rather than making a person learn MongoDB commands and writing them. I struggled while writing these MongoDB commands. I had not seen such queries before. It was pretty difficult to get them. This is one of the areas where it would help from the improvement standpoint."
"We find it difficult to incorporate MongoDB in some projects."
"It would be much more useful if I have an admin user and a password."
"Enhancing the documentation to make it more beginner-friendly is crucial."
"I have found the solution difficult to operate as an administrator."
"The auto transaction feature is something that I found a little bit problematic. If we want to run two or three transactions at a time, we get write conflicts. So, it becomes really difficult when concurrency comes into the picture."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Aerospike Database 7, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with Cassandra, SingleStore, ScyllaDB, Accumulo and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.