We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"MongoDB has a simple data-loading interface."
"It is easy to use."
"In our case, it is most important to have redundancy."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the ease of connections, aggregation, and queries."
"The most valuable feature is the geometric information done with GeoJSON."
"The clustering is very good. It allows us to have high availability."
"It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven."
"The tool performs well."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"I feel that most people don't know a lot about MongoDB, so maybe they could add some more documentation and tutorials."
"The performance of the solution could be improved."
"I suppose it could be a little more secure."
"The user interface is not as friendly as Oracle, which is something that can be improved."
"The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes."
"A normal Oracle or database tester will take some time to gear up to MongoDB because the way of writing queries is different in MongoDB. There should be some kind of midway where a person who is coming from an Oracle background can write a query and get a response by using something like a select * statement or other such things. There should be some way for MongoDB to interpret these commands rather than making a person learn MongoDB commands and writing them. I struggled while writing these MongoDB commands. I had not seen such queries before. It was pretty difficult to get them. This is one of the areas where it would help from the improvement standpoint."
"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."
"There is a need for improvement in MongoDB's customer support."
"The installation is difficult."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle Berkeley DB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.