MOVEit vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Progress Software Logo
3,617 views|2,665 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MOVEit and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The automation is generally very simple that helps with operational efficiency. Since we mainly created interfaces and scheduled transfers, the tool itself handled the file transfer automation.""The convenience of renaming files and using time stamps to segregate them has been very valuable.""It satisfies our requirements but they don't do new improvements as per the market.""MOVEit's best features were the number of options available, like folder creation, and user-friendliness.""Especially at the time of monitoring, it's a nice way to take a look at the script and take a look at run time, which gives enough information for the files that are getting picked or not.""The log findings and troubleshooting on MOVEit are pretty easy. When you go to the logs, it clearly tells you what time a transfer happened, what time it failed, what is the source path, what is the destination path, and what is the failure reason. It's pretty straightforward.""Offers a large collection of very good path planning algorithms.""From an administration standpoint, it's very easy to manage, and I feel pretty confident in the security of the product. From an end-user standpoint also, it's very easy."

More MOVEit Pros →

"We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer."

More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup is a bit difficult.""Communication can be improved between the product owners and users.""With the new other vendors coming up, they come up with certain features, in addition to the file transfer. But MOVEit does not develop their product. That's why we are looking out for other solutions.""It would be beneficial to include a feature that allows you to hide items and not be locked out if someone has made too many password attempts.""If the transfers are more or the file size is big, it takes more time. It doesn't have much capacity to process multiple files at the same time. It can get stuck or take a lot of time to process the files.""It takes some time to learn and understand how the solution functions.""Since I have to monitor two times a day, it would be nice if they have script templates.""At times, we had connection issues with MOVEit, and it had a tendency to reboot without any reason."

More MOVEit Cons →

"The solution’s technical support should be improved."

More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I haven't really priced out many other products like this, but I feel it's reasonable. Their upgrade support after hours was going to be $6,000. I just made the decision to wing it and just do it during business hours and call support if there was a problem."
  • "When compared to other products I've used, I believe MoveIt is worth the money someone might pay to use it."
  • "Technical support is only available with a paid license."
  • "It's cost-effective."
  • More MOVEit Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The log findings and troubleshooting on MOVEit are pretty easy. When you go to the logs, it clearly tells you what time a transfer happened, what time it failed, what is the source path, what is the… more »
    Top Answer:If the transfers are more or the file size is big, it takes more time. It doesn't have much capacity to process multiple files at the same time. It can get stuck or take a lot of time to process the… more »
    Top Answer:We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer.
    Top Answer:The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000. The pricing of the solution should come down.
    Top Answer:The solution’s technical support should be improved. The solution's initial setup and third-party integrations could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,617
    Comparisons
    2,665
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    918
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    251
    Comparisons
    213
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    213
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ipswitch File Transfer, Ipswitch Managed File Transfer
    Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    Ipswitch Managed File Transfer is an automated file transfer system to manage, view, and control all file transfer services. You will always know where your files are with predictable and secure delivery, extensive reporting, and easy integration with existing systems.

    Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

    Sample Customers
    Cambridgeshire County Council, Capita Document & Information Services, Enterasys, City of Guelph, Hermes
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company29%
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company14%
    Logistics Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MOVEit is ranked 1st in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 12 reviews while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is ranked 20th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 1 review. MOVEit is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of MOVEit writes "Provides the ability to securely transfer very large files and has great logging capability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server writes "The solution can be used for internal file transfer, but its technical support and third-party integrations should be improved". MOVEit is most compared with IBM Sterling File Gateway, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, WS_FTP Server, Kiteworks and Fortra's Automate, whereas SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is most compared with WS_FTP Server and Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.