We performed a comparison between N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, TeamViewer and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)."We like that this solution is in real-time, it gives us real-time monitoring."
"The solution provides an administration panel where we can see what is happening on our client's stations, such as events, alerts, and all the software installed."
"The most helpful feature is script deployment because we can create whatever we want to deploy on our devices. This works in a cloud environment, where we previously relied on Active Directory. Since the start of the COVID outbreak, all the staff members began working from home, and most of the people there did not use the VPN to transfer the policies."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The reporting for this solution has been most valuable."
"The integrated backup and the scripting are good."
"The network device is a good feature. In a place where you need to monitor your firewall switches, you can add an RMM tool and monitor it on the same screen on the same setup for the same client. Network devices are very good."
"The most valuable aspect of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management is it provides an all-in solution for the different solutions."
"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."
"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."
"The initial setup was not complex."
"Zabbix is an excellent performance monitoring tool."
"Simple network monitoring that is easy to install and manage."
"In terms of customization and integration, we have more flexibility. We can automate configurations, define deletion rules, and customize based on the needs. The client interface allows for further configuration, making it quite comprehensive."
"Zabbix helps to save time."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"The patch management of the solution could improve."
"There is quite a bit of delay on the portal where we receive monitoring information from the endpoint agent on the remote device. Sometimes it gets stuck with no live response from the device, and you have to refresh the portal just to make sure that it's projecting the right information."
"There are disconnection issues sometimes."
"The SentinelOne integration is not great."
"I would like to see notifications sent with SMS."
"The product looks a bit old-fashioned."
"The solutions could improve by adding more features."
"Kaseya is a similar product and they have easier scripts. If you want to deploy one software to 100 machines, we need to dig into it and then we need to create the script and work with the support team and then we can deploy that particular script. The pre-built scripted is the one thing that I would definitely like to have improved."
"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."
"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"The solution needs to add features for finding loopholes or problems and their root causes."
"There is a bit of a learning curve during installation."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."
"Implementing Zabbix is difficult. I've deployed many solutions over the years, and Zabbix is the hardest to implement. You have to do some development to get it to work with IBM, Micro Focus, or HP products."
More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is ranked 6th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 13 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 100 reviews. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management writes "User-friendly and allows you to do different activities on a single interface, and gives you visibility into multiple devices, but its reporting interface and report generation could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is most compared with N-able N-central, ConnectWise RMM, NinjaOne, Fortinet FortiSIEM and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
