We performed a comparison between Nagios Network Analyzer and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It is highly customizable and can be integrated well with third-party software."
"The network monitoring feature, especially, stands out to me."
"Network tracking is the most valuable feature of Network Analyzer."
"The solution is useful for monitoring network devices."
"I have found that it has a good GUI and user-friendly administration."
"The tool's UI is user-friendly, and pricing is affordable. It is very easy to deploy and learn."
"What I like the most is the bandwidth assessment."
"What people found most valuable in SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is its report customization feature."
"As it offers enterprise solutions, it has all the essential features for business."
"The software management tools are very useful for our customers."
"I would rate NetFlow Traffic Analyzer's stability ten out of ten."
"The program is scalable enough for our usage."
"This solution gives us important information about the utilization of protocols, particularly in terms of how often they are used."
"The most valuable feature is the alarm that is set up to trigger based on bandwidth utilization."
"Nagios Network Analyzer should integrate an application monitoring solution to monitor application bandwidth usage."
"It has an old-fashioned interface."
"The graphics and reports can be a little bit better."
"The bandwidth for its front-end version needs enhancement."
"There are some loopholes you need to be aware of from a security perspective."
"There is room for improvement on the setup side."
"They need to have some automation models embedded in them."
"I think the reports can be improved. They're adopted."
"The price of the solution is a bit high for our clients. They should consider adjusting their price model."
"One area that we struggle with is the price. Because the price of this solution is so high, we are largely unable to introduce it into the local market, and only the banking sector has the means to afford it."
"The licensing should be more realistic so that we can adjust the number of nodes according to my needs, rather than in fixed increments."
"The pricing is expensive."
"It does not flow. It cannot do our metric performance monitoring. So it is very limited. They can do it but in a very limited fashion. It is only good for SNMP-based alerts."
"It can be complex to set up and configure."
"It's not a cheap product, so the pricing could be improved."
"Customer Support is quite complex."
More SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
Nagios Network Analyzer is ranked 10th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 9 reviews while SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is ranked 6th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 34 reviews. Nagios Network Analyzer is rated 7.8, while SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Nagios Network Analyzer writes "User friendly, cloud scalability, with surpassed return on investment goals". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer writes "Displays traffic visibility and efficient traffic flows". Nagios Network Analyzer is most compared with Vectra AI and Darktrace, whereas SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Zabbix, ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer, SolarWinds NPM and Darktrace. See our Nagios Network Analyzer vs. SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.