We performed a comparison between Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."
"It's a very good case management system."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."
"Could include additional customization"
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"Its user interface could be better."
"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and BioCatch, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
