We performed a comparison between Omada Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The solution is stable."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."
"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."
"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."
"This product is easy to use."
"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."
"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."
"The initial setup was very straightforward."
"Great management interface."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is stable."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has good performance."
"The pricing is very competitive and the feature sets are very good. It compares well against more expensive options."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the workflow-driven setup for the infrastructure component."
"The solution is very easy to install."
"The solution is expensive."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."
"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."
"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."
"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."
"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."
"The technical support could be improved."
"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."
"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."
"If they can integrate or release a single platform because, currently, there are two different platforms for switches and routers. So, maintaining just one unified platform, like, for example, unifying the models or brands, and avoiding separate platforms for edge switches, edge routers, and other Ubiquiti products, would simplify the integration and implementation process."
"The strength of the signal from the access points could be improved."
"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."
"I have never used cloud solutions. My first approach would be something related to the cloud, and backups on the cloud, and maybe an easier way to connect to it because I have an on-premises environment."
"The product needs to improve the user interface in the migration from old to new versions."
"The solution could improve by having a cloud version. A cloud version is the easiest to configure anywhere in the world."
"The room for improvement is in the controller levels."
"The support needs improvement. The official support is kind of complex. It's not that straightforward compared to Cisco and Aruba."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Omada Access Points is ranked 15th in Wireless LAN with 14 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 36 reviews. Omada Access Points is rated 7.6, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Omada Access Points writes "They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Omada Access Points is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Instant, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
