OneSpan DIGIPASS vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OneSpan Logo
927 views|770 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
RSA Logo
329 views|280 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OneSpan DIGIPASS and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Pros →

"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features.""Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services.""The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us.""The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement.""Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pros →

Cons
"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Cons →

"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction.""It has taken years to implement.""RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow.""I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages...""Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further.""The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
  • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    22nd
    Views
    927
    Comparisons
    770
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    Views
    329
    Comparisons
    280
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VASCO DIGIPASS, DIGIPASS
    Learn More
    Overview
    DIGIPASS authenticators are the most effective first-line-of-defense and have a proven record of stopping hacking attacks.
    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    AGBank, Odeabank, Bradesco, Briggs and Morgan, Caixa Galicia, Chicago Clearing House Association, Diamond Bank Plc, DnB NOR, Document Centric Solutions
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm51%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise79%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OneSpan DIGIPASS is ranked 22nd in Authentication Systems while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. OneSpan DIGIPASS is rated 7.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of OneSpan DIGIPASS writes "Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". OneSpan DIGIPASS is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA SecurID, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.