We performed a comparison between OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"The solution is very stable."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"The technical support is excellent."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."
"Technical support is excellent."
"I have not received any complaints about the performance."
"The stability has been great."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."
"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."
"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."
"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."
"The product’s on-premise version is costly in terms of extra charges for SQL database and Windows server licenses."
"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."
"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."
"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.