We performed a comparison between Opvizor and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Virtualization Management Tools."The ability to analyze my virtual infrastructure data against a rule base of 730+ rules has been the most valuable."
"Ease of support is one of the main features that we have with it. We're able to take Snapshots before doing updates to make it easy to roll back if something does happen to go wrong."
"It is very versatile. All features are beneficial and very good, especially DRS and resource pooling."
"The most valuable feature of VMware vSphere is the ability to work in a big system infrastructure."
"The benefit of the solution is that you can create template-based servers within minutes. If you were to use a physical server, it would probably take several hours, if not a whole day, to get everything set up the way you need."
"In terms of overall features, vSphere's stability stands out on top. Not only is it highly stable, but we're also able to have a quick backup server on standby."
"We are able to create virtual machines and move them from one host to another, controlling the resources."
"The performance of VMware vSphere is good."
"The solution is also very simple and efficient to manage. Features that have made it simple and easy to manage include the newer VAMI for the V-center appliance, it's very easy to see what version we are at, and very easy to upgrade to the next version. The fact that we can now use VCHA at the appliance level just decreases our chance of having an outage because so many of our customers rely on the API interface for V-center."
"Having the ability to automate some things would be nice but is not a requirement with the product today."
"It's an expensive solution."
"The licensing costs for the solution are quite high."
"The documentation could be improved. It does not help me to show the client the value of going with VMware vSphere rather than an open source or cheaper solution."
"VMware vSphere could improve on the automation features and the ease of use of the solution in many areas, such as the interface. However, VMware is doing lots of great things."
"It would be nice to see it a little more tightly integrated with the patching solution so you could do it in one pane of glass. Right now, you have to jump back and forth. It's still not difficult, but you have to jump back and forth to do your update definitions and then go back and actually do the updates themselves."
"The solution is stable. It has some small bugs which are not influencing the main functions but every software has some bugs."
"VMware vSphere needs to increase the datastore volume."
"The only concern that I have with VMware is the support. It is very limited and can be better."
Opvizor is ranked 6th in Virtualization Management Tools with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Opvizor is rated 10.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Opvizor writes "Say goodbye to those sneaky broken and invalid snapshots hiding in your VMware environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Opvizor is most compared with , whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM, VMware Workstation and KVM.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
