Oracle Advanced Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
530 views|389 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
2,734 views|2,093 comparisons
78% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Advanced Security and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption.
To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the data encryption option for columns and tables.""The features that are the most used by the customers and partners are, at the moment, for GDPR, so obviously data encryption and data reduction. Our customers also like the partitioning option."

More Oracle Advanced Security Pros →

"The solution is great for large-scale deployments.""It is stable.""The most valuable feature is the ease of use.""Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection.""We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities.""The best feature of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is the encryption itself. Encryption truly is the way to go because nowadays we are living in an era of widespread server threats, and you need to encrypt your emails and documents because you never know who might get hold of them.""The initial setup was easy.""One notable aspect is the ability to customize alerts and other settings."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Pros →

Cons
"Having a single command to encrypt a table would be an improvement.""It is really constrained as an environment because you cannot change something that would be useful. It is a very good product because it is very similar to what you have on-premises. Yes, it is constrained, but it is expected because it is a platform as a service so it has to be constrained."

More Oracle Advanced Security Cons →

"From an administration point of view, maybe it would be ideal to have it centrally managed.""I do not find the environment to be very user-friendly.""The UI could be improved.""The product can be expensive. Price was a factor in moving away from the product.""There are other solutions in the market that have new features. The feature could improve.""It's difficult to integrate the solution with the DLP""What I didn't find helpful in the version we used is the fact that all devices had to be on the same network for us to push through the encryption.""Upgrades from one version to another may only sometimes be straightforward, especially if one needs a clearer understanding of the process."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It can be expensive. However, if you plan to scale or are at a large enterprise company, this product could be what you need."
  • "The licensing costs yearly are $5000."
  • "They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options."
  • "Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."
  • "The pricing is fair but there is variability in our area that needs to be addressed."
  • "The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."
  • "The license is not very expensive."
  • "There is a license required for this solution."
  • More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protection… more »
    Top Answer:Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection.
    Top Answer:We need to acquire a new license. Considering the fluctuation in exchange rates in our part of the world, we find it generally affordable. However, if there's room for it to be made more… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 28 in Endpoint Encryption
    Views
    530
    Comparisons
    389
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    out of 28 in Endpoint Encryption
    Views
    2,734
    Comparisons
    2,093
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    341
    Rating
    6.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Symantec Drive Encryption
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle Advanced Security provides data encryption and strong authentication services to the Oracle database, safeguarding sensitive data against unauthorized access from the network and the operating system. It also protects against theft, loss, and improper decommissioning of storage media and database backups.

    Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.
    Sample Customers
    IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish water, trueblue, AirAsia
    Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Government10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Healthcare Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm58%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government5%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Endpoint Encryption
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Advanced Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Encryption while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews. Oracle Advanced Security is rated 8.0, while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Advanced Security writes "Good support, stable, and offers encryption at both the column and table level". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". Oracle Advanced Security is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Microsoft BitLocker, Voltage SecureData Enterprise, Protegrity Data Security and Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, whereas Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and WinMagic SecureDoc.

    See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

    We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.