We performed a comparison between Oracle API Management and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management."The initial setup isn't overly difficult."
"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."
"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."
"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."
"The flexibility is definitely a highlight. We have flexible mapping capabilities, allowing us to provide common mappings or create custom ones as needed."
"Yes WSO2 API Manager is scalable"
"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."
"WSO2 API Manager is easy to use."
"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."
"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."
"As far as I am aware this solution is the first API Publisher that allows you to create and publish API and to manage the API lifecycle."
"One of the great things about WSO2 API Manager is that it is so easy to adopt. And because it's an open source solution, we're able to extend the implementation any time to suit our company needs better."
"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."
"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."
"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."
"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."
"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."
"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."
"API Manager is not easy to scale because some of its components lack scalability. It's a difficult point. Especially because companies are so cloud-based these days, microservice scalability is a major thing."
"The interface needs to be modernized and made more user friendly so the product continues to have a growing community of users."
"From what I have experienced from the versions I have tried, they could improve on the multi-tenant environments to allow some kind of SSO single sign-on between tenant."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"The tool's commercial aspect could be improved. Pricing varies with partners, so selecting the appropriate pricing can be challenging."
Oracle API Management is ranked 21st in API Management with 5 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 34 reviews. Oracle API Management is rated 7.8, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle API Management writes "Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". Oracle API Management is most compared with Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and IBM API Connect, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Apache APISIX and Microsoft Azure API Management.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
