We performed a comparison between Oracle Application Development Framework and Spring Boot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ease of integration with other Oracle products."
"There are several valuable features. First is the fast deployment. Also the ease of use."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the business components."
"We can create objects that allow us to develop pages and applications very rapidly."
"It's database-centric, and it's seemingly easy to use the model–view–controller pattern that's built-in."
"The best part of Oracle ADF is being able to easily write code in Java with JavaBean files."
"The single sign-on features applied to Oracle Cloud is a valuable feature. All parts of this application are compatible with single sign-on, where you have a security feature that is very good in Oracle Cloud."
"The most valuable feature of the Oracle Application Development Framework is the rapid development and the security it provides."
"It's great because it simplifies development. Together with MyBatis they make a beautiful pair for Java development."
"Spring Boot could improve its integration with the major cloud providers. Connectivity with cloud solutions isn't easy compared to other frameworks like Django and Python."
"The configuration setup in Spring Boot is pretty simplified compared to Hibernate ORM."
"The solution is easy to use; I primarily employ integrated templates such as the REST template."
"We like that the product is open-source."
"We like that it is an open-source tool."
"Spring Boot's most valuable functionalities include inversion of control, dependency injection, and the ability to gather all services, models, and controllers together for easy connectivity to your REST API, as well as the ability to build a modular response and request system. It seamlessly integrates with various backends, such as SQL, events, and messaging systems, making it a user-friendly and efficient Java tool. Additionally, it functions as a reliable business transaction layer, providing excellent support for front-end and back-end visual tools."
"The setup is straightforward."
"You need to have Oracle ADF on-premises to build a big project. You need to have a dependable front-end application."
"Oracle ADF needs more components and the layout can be improved."
"Oracle Application Development Framework is set to go out of support over the next three years but they should provide support for the solution for the longer term. Additionally, there needs to be more overall optimization and specifically in webpage rendering. The solution uses a lot of resources, and in order for them to move forward, they would have to create a smaller resource impact."
"The application needs to be more lightweight and the performance improved."
"I use JDeveloper along with ADF and, unfortunately, JDeveloper is a very slow tool. It takes a lot of time to accomplish things with it during both development and deployment. I hope that Oracle will improve JDeveloper to make it run faster."
"The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization."
"The performance of this solution needs to be improved because it is very slow."
"The UI is very slow and not up to market standard."
"Building a new product in Spring Boot can take a long time since the solution uses reflection. This is one area the solution could be improved."
"Spring Boot is okay right now, but my team is looking for some integration where you can make a call to the JMS messaging service and other types of third-party integrations. If the integration with Spring Boot is improved, that would make the tool better. What I'd like to see in the next release of Spring Boot is its integration or tie-up with messaging servers and third-party EFPs, as that would make it very good and more competitive versus other new solutions in the market."
"This is a really good solution for me and I can't think of anything that can be improved."
"We'd like to have fewer updates."
"The services we develop are purely synchronous services, so there's a blocking and waiting state. This is a big problem in microservices."
"If you want to have multiple integrations, the setup phase will become complex."
"The security could be simplified."
"They should integrate the solution with more AI and machine learning platforms."
More Oracle Application Development Framework Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Application Development Framework is ranked 8th in Java Frameworks with 9 reviews while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews. Oracle Application Development Framework is rated 7.8, while Spring Boot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Development Framework writes "Eases the writing of code in Java with JavaBeans; easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". Oracle Application Development Framework is most compared with Spring MVC, Jakarta EE and Apache Spark, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Jakarta EE, Open Liberty, Apache Spark, Eclipse MicroProfile and Amazon Corretto. See our Oracle Application Development Framework vs. Spring Boot report.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.