We performed a comparison between Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."The technical support is good, they have been responsive and helpful."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Initial setup of databases is not a problem."
"It has improved my company by cutting my time to market."
"The feature I think should be improved is the option to rename the machines."
"We are not using any features offered by OCI but only using virtual machines. So our data only syncs from our On-premises to cloud. The compute and performance are better than other cloud solutions."
"The product gives you independence from hardware onsite, the setup is easy, and there is no need for hardware maintenance."
"There is ROI with the product's use."
"One of the best features of this solution is that it is web-based and you can log in and work on it from anywhere."
"It's suitable for various sizes of companies. I have used it with big companies and with small ones as well."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"Great Integration Suite, with CPI being its stable component."
"The most valuable features of SAP Cloud Platform are security integration and scalability."
"The entire SAP ecosystem is a valuable feature. It provides access to SAP S/4HANA, ACG systems, and their Fiori launchpad, making it easy to navigate between them. This makes the enterprise very accessible."
"The product captures data in real time."
"The solution can scale."
"It takes more time to release resources than one of its competitors."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
"The Oracle Cloud platform remains complex, and despite the abundance of resources available, significant challenges can still arise during the migration process from a legacy or on-premise system. Conversely, smaller companies with less complicated systems, such as those with a two million budget, can migrate more easily."
"The packaging part of the software needs improvement. It lacks customization abilities for users. Giving them VMs for machine learning or running their own programs like Azure and Amazon, for example. Things like scalability based on the requirement of the tools. Oracle still lacks these kinds of things. For example, if you need a VM from Oracle, you need to pay for a monthly fee. They started developing containership but it's still at the initial stage and it's still lacking. They also need to develop integration between packages."
"They offer some basic services but the choice is not as rich as other cloud providers."
"Oracle Cloud's support could be improved because its second-line support has weak engineers who handle stuff a little bit slowly."
"There's one app I have to install on my device, the Articulate Player app. It's only available on Apple and Android, but it's not available for Windows. I can't run the program on my desktop, to use it to learn Java."
"The product could use some more development and maturity so it has more peripheral functionality already integrated."
"I want to see better pricing from the SAP Cloud Platform in the future. I also want more security and scalability from it."
"The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products."
"Speaking about the public cloud, it's a very rigid system. So, there is not a lot of customization possible in a public cloud environment."
"They are still developing this product. It does not really have 100% of the necessary features available to properly service business clients"
"SAP Cloud Platform's installation is not straightforward. You need a person with knowledge to handle it."
"Planning features are limited to the finance module."
"When I started looking at the client's IT architecture, I started by doing a study of their services, DVM, data volume, and management services. According to the results, they could be a lot better at this."
"While it was good for a small entity, it was not ideal for a large enterprise."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in PaaS Clouds with 91 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 6th in PaaS Clouds with 38 reviews. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and OpenShift.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
