We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Tibero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"The most valuable feature is that Database-In-Memory is more consistent and faster than traditional databases as it requires fewer CPUs to process instructions."
"The solution is very fast."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"
"The solution's ROI is excellent."
"We use the tool for real-time data transfer for risk management purposes. In a trading system, conversions happen fast. We use the product to handle fast transactions with low latency."
"It accelerates query processing, which in turn speeds up operations and streamlines workflow, and ultimately enhancing productivity."
"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."
"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."
"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."
"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"Technical support is below our expectations currently. It could be improved."
"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."
"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"The product could be more economical."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"Oracle Database In-Memory appliance-based solutions can be restrictive for some applications, as they may require more flexibility in the database design to be tuned and sized to the customer's needs."
"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."
"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 8th in Relational Databases Tools with 27 reviews while Tibero is ranked 25th in Relational Databases Tools. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while Tibero is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, SQL Server and Apache Derby, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server and Altibase. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
