We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"It is not a very stable tool, and you need to monitor it perfectly."
"What needs improvement in Oracle GoldenGate is the support. Another feature that needs to be improved in the solution is its GUI. It would be useful for programmers or users to be able to work from the GUI, not just from the command line. Simplifying how Oracle GoldenGate is used would also make the solution better."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
"It would be better for Oracle Golden Gate Studio GUI to include other licensed products (i.e. Veridata or others)."
"Lacks the ability to become a full-scale ETL tool."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"The GoldenGate license is very costly."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while SAP Replication Server is ranked 27th in Data Integration with 6 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while SAP Replication Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Replication Server writes "Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas SAP Replication Server is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Fivetran, SSIS, SAP Data Services and Azure Data Factory. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. SAP Replication Server report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.