We performed a comparison between Oracle Multitenant and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."
"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."
"It's easy to use and works great."
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"
"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."
"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."
"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."
"You can scale the solution as needed."
"The memory is the solution's most valuable feature. It's the main feature of HANA. Others are still the regular IT databases that are on storage and are therefore much slower than HANA. The solution is quite fast."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the integration with other solutions in data quality."
"Provides us with predictive capabilities for asset maintenance, and real-time forecasts."
"This is a feature-rich product and I like all of them."
"The solution can easily be modeled."
"The in-memory computing and the efficient response time are very good features."
"What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics."
"We have found the solution to be customizable and it is beneficial it comes as a bundled package. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."
"Technical support could be faster."
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."
"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."
"The user interface for this solution can be made better."
"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."
"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."
"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."
"The solution could improve in the handling of backup data and the administration tools."
"Ease of use could be improved in SAP HANA. I like SAP because SAP solutions can be used by anyone, which means even laymen can start working on SAP tools, but in SAP HANA modeling, you'll need to know some other technologies and sequel scripting, and you need a separate skillset, so if you don't have the skillset, you won't be able to work on SAP HANA. Making SAP HANA low-code would make it even better."
"The SAP HANA interface has room for improvement because it takes more work to manage than the Microsoft SQL Server interface."
"I would like to see improvements in the connectivity of the solution with other BI software. Not every software can connect to it natively."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"The JDBC connectors are very slow."
"I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has."
"Technical support should be more customer-friendly."
Oracle Multitenant is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.