We performed a comparison between Oracle Multitenant and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"
"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."
"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."
"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."
"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."
"You can scale the solution as needed."
"It's easy to use and works great."
"The solution is easy to scale."
"We can save data very easily."
"We have found that the Fiori Apps are particularly good."
"The solution is marvelous because it controls everything including workflow and that makes our company more productive."
"The feature I found most valuable in SAP HANA is modeling. I also like that the solution has good integration and you can integrate it with any system, even third-party systems."
"When we upgraded, we received more functions or more features."
"Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics."
"It is very flexible to integrate with SaaS components."
"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."
"Technical support could be faster."
"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."
"The user interface for this solution can be made better."
"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."
"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."
"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."
"The openness of the system could be more developed. The solution should go into the cloud. The cloud mechanism should be more invested."
"The relationship with a partner that sells SAP could be better. We depend much more on our own development, and the partner is for selling us the solutions, so we need them to be able to supply help and answers. The partner isn't very helpful, and we have to rely on our own knowledge and research."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"I give the scalability of SAP HANA a six out of ten."
"The product lacks some flexibility in its settings and configurations."
"High availability and disaster recovery are very poor in HANA."
"The SAP HANA interface has room for improvement because it takes more work to manage than the Microsoft SQL Server interface."
"It is challenging to integrate it with third-party tools."
Oracle Multitenant is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.