We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and WordPress based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"The product provides capabilities to build modern websites and can be used for various aspects of services."
"The best feature of WordPress is its flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quite easy to use."
"WordPress offers great flexibility."
"I like how it integrates graphics and words, and more generally, the way people can develop the choices of spaces for different websites."
"It is easy to edit content using WordPress."
"Ready-made themes speed the design process; a huge number of quality themes are available from several sources."
"We use WordPress on two different websites and it solves all of our website issues."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"Its functions need more stability."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"It could be a little bit easier to use."
"One area of improvement is hosting. It should have its file manager regardless of where you host your website."
"In WordPress, the user onboarding process is an area with complexities...there is no step-by-step explanation provided."
"WordPress could use improvement in terms of optimization, especially for large websites with extensive databases and many images."
"The basic product is becoming less usable by end users for site maintenance post delivery."
"I would recommend dumping the Gutenberg interface, as that is horrible."
"I would like to have the ability to customize the whole WordPress installation. WordPress comes with a number of core features. I would love to be able to remove those I'm not using at the moment."
"I would like to see a new UI."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 7th in Web Content Management with 12 reviews while WordPress is ranked 2nd in Web Content Management with 28 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while WordPress is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WordPress writes "Very customizable, and forms the base for most websites on the Internet". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas WordPress is most compared with SharePoint, Quintype, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and Adobe Experience Manager.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
