We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"The technical support is perfect."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"The architecture of OutSystems is quite simple, and the features are similar to Mendix's. OutSystems has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities. You can also integrate with any content management platform like SharePoint or Adobe Enterprise Manager, or something like that. You can also create and integrate workflows."
"It is very stable."
"One thing I like about OutSystems is that there's no lock-in. You can keep running your applications because it's on .NET and hosted centrally. That's one of the advantages I see there in terms of not having an IT strategy that has a dependency on a particular platform."
"The scalability of OutSystems is very good, it scales automatically very useful for us."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible."
"While I can't speak to the market impact, as a developer, I've seen significant reductions in development time across different versions of our applications. One area for improvement would be the UI controls in Service Studio. Sometimes, controls don't appear in the IDE, requiring us to check them in the web browser instead. Overall, our experience with OutSystems has been positive, though improvements in UI development would be welcomed."
"We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."
"I would like to see improvements in versioning. It can be challenging to keep track of what changes should be committed, especially when many developers are working in one environment."
"The solution is costly."
"Its ability to create and run automated tasks could be better."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Ionic, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.