We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of this solution is the ability to manage our devices centrally. Additionally, we can monitor the workforce connections, receive reports, and use the backup feature."
"It is really useful for big deployments."
"I found it easy to learn how to pull information from the logs."
"It's easy to deploy any software or policies."
"The most valuable feature is the Threat Intelligence."
"Palo Alto technical support is excellent."
"It allows administrators to manage all firewalls from a single interface, reducing the time and effort required for configuration."
"It's helpful that the solution allows us to control all the firewalls from one device."
"The biggest benefit for us was the time frame to complete a ticket. It went from approximately a week and a half to two weeks down to about three days."
"A customer is able to submit a request for access and Tufin will automatically analyze the system to find out where the rule needs to go, and then design the rule for you."
"The most valuable feature of Tufin is we have better visibility and management of our file infrastructure."
"We use this product to sharpen our change cycle. A request used to take quite a while as we did manual assessments. A lot of that is now done through SecureTrack."
"It's user-friendly. It's easy to understand menus on the web GUI. That's a good feature for us. I can say that it's doing what it's supposed to do. It also integrates well with other products like Check Point."
"The automated reporting on a regular basis is helping us to be compliant with legal requirements."
"Tufin has improved my organization with its configuration management. It has tremendously improved the operation's success and has made life easier."
"The most valuable feature of Tufin is rule analysis."
"We have experienced a few bugs which the team at Palo Alto don't have solutions for."
"The initial setup requires expertise and can be a bit complex."
"The pricing is quite high."
"It's difficult to implement."
"There is a need to improve the upgrade process. When we are upgrading the solution we are facing some issues with Elasticsearch services. Every time we upgrade it takes a long time to become stable."
"It could be more secure."
"Reporting might be an area to improve. It can provide reporting or some sort of graphical representation of your environment."
"The solution should improve the speed at which they make changes on the system. Historically, they've been a bit slow in that respect. They should apply changes to the box quicker and more often."
"We would like to see more in terms of integration with other application types within the context, such as next-generation firewalls or next-generation threat devices that are out there."
"The initial setup can be tough."
"We have had a couple issues with the VMs, but I think it was just because they were starving for resources. A recommendation on what the virtual appliances should have for resources would be appreciated."
"The two main negative points with Tufin Orca are the absence of full support and that accommodation of files and tools is not provided in a good way."
"The pricing of the solution is rather expensive."
"The biggest area where I see a need for improvement is some of the documentation and training stuff. It does a really good job of hitting the big concepts, but it needs like another layer deeper of actually getting into some of the details of how to do some of the things. Conceptually, I understand how the product works, but now how do I start building stuff and integrating it into my environment."
"This solution would benefit from better reporting functionality with graphing so that reports can be presented to management."
"There are things that could be explained a little better for somebody brand new to this system, which could be helpful, especially if it was in real-time while you were working in the system. Having the ability in real-time to be able to understand search query suggestions would be helpful."
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 80 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, FireMon Security Manager and Skybox Security Suite, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Cisco Defense Orchestrator. See our Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.