Panaya Test Dynamix vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Panaya Logo
727 views|338 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Ranorex Logo
3,422 views|2,515 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Panaya Test Dynamix and Ranorex Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.""The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use.""The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts.""It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.""Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.""Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.""The solution helps with recording and documentation."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pros →

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance.""This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.""Object identification is good.""Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations.""Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.""The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.""Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.""The solution is stable."

More Ranorex Studio Pros →

Cons
"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection.""The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install.""Support is reactive and in English only.""Nothing is automatic.""They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Cons →

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.""The object detection functionality needs to be improved.""The solution's technical support team could be responsive.""For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.""If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.""Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful.""When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too.""The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

More Ranorex Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."
  • "It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."
  • More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."
  • "The licensing fees depend on the number of users."
  • "There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."
  • "This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."
  • More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution helps with recording and documentation.
    Top Answer:We cannot create test cases. Nothing is automatic. The tool hasn’t reduced our testing time. I have to do the manual testing. The version of the solution that I am using does not have the option to… more »
    Top Answer:Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.
    Top Answer:I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.
    Top Answer:There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    Views
    727
    Comparisons
    338
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    428
    Rating
    8.0
    7th
    Views
    3,422
    Comparisons
    2,515
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

    With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

    Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

    Sample Customers
    Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
    Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Retailer5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Regression Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 11th in Regression Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Ranorex Studio is ranked 7th in Regression Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.4, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest, Worksoft Certify, OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and OpenText UFT One.

    See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.