We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."
"For what I need TFS for, I have never run into any limitation."
"The solution is very much stable."
"TFS’s test management capability without the expensive licensing has large gaps. Users will be unable to access performance testing and coded UI testing capabilities."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"TFS' most valuable feature is the triage process. It is a robust solution that is easy to use."
"I like its MTM (Microsoft Test Manager) section which gives us options to create various test plans and add test cases into it."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"I'm looking for specific options that aren't currently available, such as active status, new status, or what's currently in progress."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"The solution's server for deployment needs to be improved."
"The reporting functionality is something that they should work on."
"I'd like to see some kind of visualization tool for TFS that would make life much easier."
"TFS's CI/CD, project pipelines, and management development could be improved."
"It has been really dated. When you start to work more in an agile environment, it is not really that flexible. They tried to replicate the look and feel of Jira, but it is not quite there. It was nice to use in the past, but it is not as flexible now with the changing development environments and methodologies."
"I would also like a true command prompt like Git."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center. See our Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs. TFS report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.