We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."
"Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy."
"The solution is very much stable."
"It is a stable solution."
"TFS's best features include user-friendly test management, bug reporting, and ID assignment."
"The most valuable feature is the backlog."
"I like the build management features and the integration with Jenkins and many other tools."
"It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"Sometimes we feel that it need more CPU, and RAMs on TFS server, either we implemented the hardware with the product minimum requirements."
"I'd like to see some kind of visualization tool for TFS that would make life much easier."
"TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online."
"We encounter issues with backups."
"There's not automatic access to test case management and execution."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
"One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management."
"The user interface could improve and test management was not useful in TFS."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.