We performed a comparison between Pentera and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The product is easy to use."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."
"It is quite straightforward to set up."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"The price could be improved."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
"The solution must provide penetration testing."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Pentera is ranked 14th in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. Pentera is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Horizon3.ai, Picus Security and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Pentera vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
