We performed a comparison between Pentera and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Penetration Testing Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The product is easy to use."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"It has improved the quality of code being delivered for test and its vulnerability resolutions timeline has improved."
"This static analysis helps ensure a secure application rollout across all environments."
"The benefits are quick discovery and understanding of software vulnerabilities that we are putting in our own code. By discovering them quickly enough, we can triage them and determine the best ways to remediate them and prevent them from happening in the future."
"We have found the static analysis to be useful in Veracode Static Analysis. However, we are in the process of testing."
"We use it to get our scan results and see where our software is vulnerable or not vulnerable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its extensive reporting capabilities and user-friendly interface."
"Veracode has good support for microservices, and I also like the sandbox environment. For example, when introducing a new component, we can scan it in a sandbox environment. It will not impact the main environment. When our team fixes it, they. can push it to the production environment when the results are acceptable."
"Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"The price could be improved."
"It does nearly everything, but penetration testing."
"From the usability perspective, it is not up to date with the latest trends. It looks very old. Tools such as Datadog, New Relic, or infrastructure security tools, such as AWS Cloud, seem very user-friendly. They are completely web-based, and you can navigate through them pretty quickly, whereas Veracode is very rigid. It is like an old-school enterprise application. It does the job, but they need to invest a little more on the usability front."
"The zip file scanning has room for improvement."
"Scanning large amounts of code can be a time-consuming process and there is scope for improvement."
"When we scan binary, when we perform binary analysis, it could go faster. That has a lot to do with the essence of scanning binary code, it takes a little bit longer. Certain aspects, depending on what type of code it is, take a little long, especially legacy code."
"In the future, I would like to see the RASP capability built-in."
"Another problem we have is that, while it is integrated with single sign-on—we are using Okta—the user interface is not great. That's especially true for a permanent link of a report of a page. If you access it, it goes to the normal login page that has nothing that says "Log in with single sign-on," unlike other software as a service that we use. It's quite bothersome because it means that we have to go to the Okta dashboard, find the Veracode link, and log in through it. Only at that point can we go to the permanent link of the page we wanted to access."
"It needs better APIs, reporting that I can easily query through the APIs and, preferably, a license model that I can predict."
Pentera is ranked 1st in Penetration Testing Services with 5 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Penetration Testing Services with 194 reviews. Pentera is rated 8.2, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Horizon3.ai, Picus Security and HackerOne Pentesting Services, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and OWASP Zap. See our Pentera vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Penetration Testing Services vendors.
We monitor all Penetration Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
