We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Uptycs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)."The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"It is fairly simple. Anybody can use it."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."
"It supports the multi-cloud environment beautifully."
"I found the network queue sets useful. I also liked the Workload Protection Module, the vulnerability findings, and how the rule sets handle the vulnerabilities based on severity."
"The initial setup is seamless."
"Its ease of integration is valuable because we need to get the solution out of the door quickly, so speed and ease matter."
"I would say Twistlock is a fairly sophisticated tool."
"The support is excellent."
"The dynamic workload identity creation, attestation, and assignment is the best feature. In addition, the application dependency map across heterogeneous environments for compliance is a striking feature."
"I find the CSPM area to be a more valuable and flexible feature."
"They have multiple great features."
"I would like additional integrations."
"With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
"I used to work on AWS. At times, I would generate a normal bug in my system, and then I would check PingSafe. The alert used to come after about three and a half hours. It used to take that long to generate the alert about the vulnerability in my system. If a hacker attacks a system and PingSafe takes three to four hours to generate an alert, it will not be beneficial for the company. It would be helpful if we get the alert in five to ten minutes."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"After closing an alert in Cloud Native Security, it still shows as unresolved."
"The challenge that Palo Alto and Prisma have is that, at times, the instructions in an event are a little bit dated and they're not usable. That doesn't apply to all the instructions, but there are times where, for example, the Microsoft or the Amazon side has made some changes and Palo Alto or Prisma was not aware of them. So as we try to remediate an alert in such a case, the instructions absolutely do not work. Then we open up a ticket and they'll reply, "Oh yeah, the API for so-and-so vendor changed and we'll have to work with them on that." That area could be done a little better."
"We face some GUI issues related to new permissions for AWS. So far, we don't have any automation to complete them through the GUI. We have to manually update the permissions. Our customers have faced some issues with that."
"It can be too expensive for small companies."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"They should improve the user experience."
"Palo Alto should work on ease-of-use and the user-friendliness to be more competitive with some competing products."
"I would like to see the inclusion of automated counter-attack, although this is probably illegal."
"The UI could be improved."
"We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 82 reviews while Uptycs is ranked 19th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 1 review. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Uptycs is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Uptycs writes "Great features, good support, and lots of functionality". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, whereas Uptycs is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Orca Security and Lacework.
See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors, best Container Security vendors, and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.