We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection and VMRay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."It has a dynamic runtime engine, which gives it an advantage over Prisma that has a static engine. In Prisma, we have to do additional malware analysis, which is not required in Proofpoint."
"IP tracing is the most valuable feature."
"We are using the TRAP console that has a Linux-based UI, which is not user-friendly. The TAP console looks very advanced. Currently, we are maintaining three different consoles, and it is sometimes hard to switch between them or try to grab the data."
"The technical support needs improvement."
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is ranked 23rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) while VMRay is ranked 27th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 1 review. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is rated 7.0, while VMRay is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection writes "Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMRay writes "Has a valuable IP tracing feature, but is an expensive solution". Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, IRONSCALES, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Microsoft Defender for Identity, whereas VMRay is most compared with Cuckoo Sandbox, Joe Sandbox Ultimate, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiSandbox and VirusTotal.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.