• Home
  • Bitam Artus vs. QlikView

Bitam Artus vs QlikView comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bitam Logo
Bitam Artus
Read 1 Bitam Artus review
161 views|111 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Qlik Logo
QlikView
Read 158 QlikView reviews
2,668 views|2,299 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitam Artus and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
OLAP ad-hoc analysis is a valuable feature but the pricing needs to be improved.
It's allowed us to implement High Performance Work teams who periodically monitor KPIs, as well as improving the infrastructure and overall work... Read more →
DorianS
Robust data analysis and visualization capabilities with good Salesforce integration
QlikView has helped improve several aspects of our organization. For example, it provides us with a deeper understanding of our sales and customer... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is a bit too high and I think licenses should be unlimited."
  • "QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."
  • "Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."
  • "It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."
  • "The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."
  • "It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."

    • More QlikView Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

    Valuable Features

    1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data visualization Turnaround time. 7. OBIEE Enterprise security Semantic model

    Room for Improvement

    1. SAP BO/BI Visualization 2. Tableau Scalability 3. IBM Cognos Ease of use 4. MS BI Visualization Ease of use 5. Pentaho Ease of use Semantic layer 6. QlikView Scalability 7. OBIEE Visualization Database connectivities

    Use of Solution

    I have used SAP for almost 12 years Tableau – Rate 6/10 overall but 9/10 for visualization. I have used it for three years IBM Cognos - Rate 7/10 and I have used it for three years MS BI - Rate 5/10 and I have used it for two years Pentaho - Rate 5/10 and I have used it for over five years QlikView- Rate 7/10 and I have used it for two years OBIEE – Rate 7/10 and I have used it for five years

    Customer Service and Technical Support

    Customer Service: SAP BO/BI - Below average Tableau - Good IBM Cognos - Average MS BI - Average Pentaho - Average QlikView - Above average OBIEE - Average Technical Support: SAP BO/BI - Below average Tableau - Good IBM Cognos - Average MS BI - Average Pentaho - Average QlikView - Above average OBIEE - Average

    Other Advice

    There is no perfect solution or one…     Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about QlikView?
    Top Answer:If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.
    Read all 21 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?
    Top Answer:My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly.
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What needs improvement with QlikView?
    Top Answer:Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView… more »
    Read all 21 answers   →
    Ranking
    43rd
    out of 114 in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
    Views
    161
    Comparisons
    111
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 50 in Reporting
    Views
    2,668
    Comparisons
    2,299
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    469
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Artus
    Learn More
    Bitam
    Qlik
    Overview

    Artus is the core of the BITAM Suite. It consists of three fundamental elements:

    • Bitam Administrator - which contains all the metadata, facilitating the creation of multidimensional structures, user security, etc.
    • Artus Designer - which allows easy and intuitive creation of scenarios.
    • Artus Web User - platform from which the user can access the greater capabilities for the management of the Decision-Making Process.

    QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

    Sample Customers
    International Trucks, Arnecom, Lamosa, Black & Decker
    Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
    May 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitam Artus is ranked 43rd in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools while QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews. Bitam Artus is rated 9.0, while QlikView is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitam Artus writes "OLAP ad-hoc analysis is a valuable feature but the pricing needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". Bitam Artus is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, whereas QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and TIBCO Spotfire.

    We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.