We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The solution is free to use."
"The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer."
"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."
"Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"It is very stable."
"Selenium web driver - Java."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"It takes such a long time to use this solution that it may be worth looking into other free solutions such as TestProject or Katalon Studio, or paid solutions to replace it."
"You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup."
"One limitation of Selenium is that it is purely focused on web application testing."
"Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%."
"The reporting part can be better."
"Selenium could offer better ways to record and create scripts. IDE is available, however, it can be improved."
"In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT One, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.