We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Qualys VM is very stable."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"The process of defining and discovering scans is organized efficiently."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"Performs automated, regular scans in the network."
"It's really beneficial for scanning and interacting with the agent."
"Tech support is helpful."
"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."
"Tenable Security Center scans networks and gives reports."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"When you want to cover yourself for scalability, you will be charged for the number you place on the scan itself."
"This solution could be improved by extending the agent capabilities to different operating systems including Mac and Linux. We would also like the capability to easily check for vulnerability in assets in the IOTs."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"The customer support is very bad."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
"Improve the user interface."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"Support could be faster."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
"We are facing some challenges related to our channel."
"The user interface can be improved."
"Security can always be improved."
"The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Horizon3.ai and Tanium. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
