We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."
"Data protection is a valuable feature."
"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."
"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."
"The solution is very stable."
"The technology enables us to have a safe backup."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
"RecoverPoint is designed to integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage. If you don't have Dell EMC storage, you can't use it with other brands like IBM or HP."
"The support is horrible."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
"In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"Compression and deduplication could be improved."
"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 18 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 23 reviews. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Snapshots allow you to restore or view the image on either the DR or production side if data is compromised and integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Protects our data during any emergency or disaster". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell AppSync. See our Dell RecoverPoint vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
