We performed a comparison between Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition and Tidal Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition is praised for its strong job definition capabilities, providing users with a wide range of options for constructing jobs. Tidal Automation is highly regarded for its exceptional job scheduling capabilities. Additionally, Tidal Automation offers a single pane of glass interface that makes it easier for users to manage and monitor workloads.
The users mentioned areas of improvement for Redwood including reporting features, monitoring and alert service, user interface, machine learning capabilities, and customer support. Tidal could benefit from improvements in the graphical user interface, pricing model, user interface intuitiveness, cloud/hybrid solution, reporting capabilities, and integration options.
Service and Support: Customers have generally positive experiences with Redwood Software's customer service, although there is potential for improvement. Tidal Automation's customer service receives high praise for being responsive, knowledgeable, and exceeding expectations. However, some customers mention that lower-priority items may occasionally be overlooked.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Redwood was difficult and took a lot of time, while Tidal Automation had a simple and straightforward setup. Redwood needed training for multiple teams and dealing with a decentralized structure, whereas Tidal only needed a few servers and a database. Redwood received mixed feedback on ease of understanding, while Tidal had useful documentation.
Pricing: Redwood Software has a higher setup cost compared to Tidal Automation. However, users find it worth the expense because of its valuable features and user framework. Redwood's pricing is notably lower than Control-M and UC4. Tidal Automation offers fair and predictable pricing, delivering good value in terms of functionality and support.
ROI: Redwood Software does not provide specific metrics on ROI. Tidal Automation has shown to bring cost savings, increased efficiency, and productivity for customers. Tidal Automation also offers reduced manual work, improved risk management, and integration capabilities.
Comparison Results: Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition outperforms Tidal Automation. Redwood Software offers more advanced features, including robust job definition and building capabilities, error-handling capabilities, and integration with diverse systems.
"This product is simple and easy to use."
"Redwood is more flexible and we can schedule the tasks based on different time zones."
"One of Redwood Software's features that I liked was its event-driven automation, which allows IT teams to respond to real-time events, alerts, and notifications from numerous systems."
"We can create and test micro-workflows to find defects sooner."
"There won't be a memory outage issue, as it uses its own server/ECC memory only."
"Error handling and the recovery feature ensure that my job processes are not stopped if any error occurs."
"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."
"Multi-platform scheduling makes it easier this way rather than accessing one platform at a time."
"It saves times due to automation. With some files, we do hundreds a day for a particular vendor. This would be hard to do manually. Also, the speed at which we can do this is excellent."
"The job dependency is something that you cannot have in a regular, simple cron job or simple scheduler dependency. The event-driven jobs are core for us, as we really need that. Therefore, we really need Tidal with its ability to run thousands of jobs per day."
"We use the solution for cross-platform, cross-application workloads. The solution’s ability to manage and monitor these workloads is very easy and accurate. We have file dependencies for running jobs. The job does not start until a file exists on a completely different server, then where the job will run. So, it is cross systems."
"It's the most efficient tool in doing repetitive tasks and saves a lot of time with minimum possibility of error."
"It has been super stable. There are no complaints on stability. We would not be using it if Tidal wasn't stable."
"The Graphical Views feature is also very good for helping us to understand a job stream. It's great for providing a visual overview of the status of a workflow, especially the Critical Path view. That is one of our favorites."
"We had a number of different schedulers in this organization and we've been porting everything that was running out of these other, unrelated schedulers into this scheduler. That has afforded us the ability to set up direct dependencies between processes that couldn't talk to one another before. Over the 15 years, we've definitely gained a lot from that. What had been manual controls have become automated controls..."
"By leveraging machine learning algorithms, Tidal Automation can use this data to optimize turbine settings and improve overall efficiency and performance."
"The job log has a size limit."
"The product could be better in terms of its monitoring and alert service."
"Redwood RunMyJobs should add more good features."
"Due to the abundance of competing automation technologies available on the market, connectivity with any cloud platform can be improved."
"Having a graphical user interface for the dashboard would be great."
"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing to new users with limited technical knowledge."
"We need the automatic creation of incidents for failed jobs."
"The documentation for this product is limited, which can be improved in the future."
"Tidal Automation could be further integrated with other systems used in the operation of tidal energy systems, such as weather forecasting tools, energy management systems, or asset management software."
"Tidal's adaptability and user-friendliness could be increased by integrating it with additional programmes and platforms."
"We've had some quirky stuff happen on an occasional basis where a job does not take off. For example, a job we expected to be finished by 3:00 a.m. is sitting there and not executing when we come in in the morning. We have to go all the way back to the dependencies and then we can see that one of the dependencies has become unscheduled, for some reason. No changes were made to the schedule but this prerequisite job has, all of a sudden, become unscheduled. I have brought this up with Tidal's support but they have never had an answer for it."
"With the client, we have had certain issues. The user interface for Tidal is a little slow. A lot of people would love this tool if they had a faster user interface. The drill-down functionality should be much quicker than what it is pulling out now. If I fill out some data, then it takes awhile to get that data back onto the screen. It's not as fast as we were expecting."
"They can do better reporting in terms of production statistics reporting."
"The GUI, the graphical user interface, gets a little bit busy."
"To better fit their unique needs, the solution should give more customization options."
"One of the weaknesses of the product is, when something happens, it's difficult to find out the root cause. There are a lot of logs you can take a look at in Tidal. Sometimes, they are useful, but other times, they're not. That is mostly relegated to the administrative team. Users for the most part don't see that and don't know anything about that. They just know they have a problem, then it's up to the administrative team to see what happened and figure out the problem."
Redwood RunMyJobs is ranked 3rd in Workload Automation with 30 reviews while Tidal by Redwood is ranked 2nd in Workload Automation with 37 reviews. Redwood RunMyJobs is rated 9.6, while Tidal by Redwood is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Redwood RunMyJobs writes "Simple to use, increases CPU speed, and reduces the cost of machine time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tidal by Redwood writes "Great visibility with a single pane of glass and a low learning curve". Redwood RunMyJobs is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Automation Intelligence and ActiveBatch by Redwood, whereas Tidal by Redwood is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, ActiveBatch by Redwood and Rocket Zeke. See our Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Tidal by Redwood report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
