We performed a comparison between Resolver GRC Suite and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The dashboard is nice. We can provide different levels of access to users based on their titles, privileges, rights, etc. It streamlines the process of auditing and technical compliance."
"The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"The solution has improved my organization by having everything combined to a single platform."
"This solution helped us with the centralization of our governance data, so we could house all of our controls in one place. We could use that central repository of all our controls to build our risk management strategy and our policy and governance. So we could use controls as a central library and build policy, and then build risk management around it."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."
"GRC Suite could have better third-party risk assessment. Maybe they can have a module that can perform certain jobs like security incident and vulnerability management because I haven't seen this module on their platform."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."
"Performance could be improved."
"The product is expensive."
"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."
Earn 20 points
Resolver GRC Suite is ranked 19th in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Resolver GRC Suite is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Resolver GRC Suite writes "It streamlines the process of auditing and technical compliance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Resolver GRC Suite is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.