We performed a comparison between RSA Archer and SAI360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"I have found all the features to be valuable, including those involving reporting, the dashboard, notifications, email modules, the database and data input."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."
"The integrated data model of a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship is quite useful."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"RSA Archer might be a bit expensive for small companies because it's a vast tool."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
"Some of the error reporting isn't very clear. When you're looking for information on error codes, you got to do a lot of digging."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
"There are some issues with the interface for version 6.5 but these may already be repaired and simplified in the new versions that have been released."
"Performance could be improved."
"Archer could be improved by having more customization. I'm not sure if the backend processes have API calls and those kinds of seamless integrations, but from the front, some of the solutions are very out-of-the-box. It's not customizable, so that could be a little problematic since you have to use their features. In terms of the backend structure, I'm not too sure because I'm not a developer—I was an end user and product owner of Archer—and I don't quite know the backend and developmental features. But since it's an out-of-the-box solution, sometimes customization was challenging and support was a little problematic because we had to reach out to them all the time."
"If the product is used in a small organization, it doesn't work well."
Earn 20 points
RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews while SAI360 is ranked 17th in GRC with 1 review. RSA Archer is rated 8.0, while SAI360 is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAI360 writes "Offers a reasonable amount of ROI and helps save costs". RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard, whereas SAI360 is most compared with NAVEX Global.
See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.