We performed a comparison between Salesforce Einstein Analytics and SAP Analytics Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Tableau CRM is a very capable solution. It is easy to use, user-friendly, and integrates well."
"Salesforce Einstein Analytics is a simplified CRM. It's integration is good."
"he most valuable feature of the solution is its ease of use."
"It is a comprehensive solution. It has everything in it. I can easily find what I need."
"The most valuable features of Salesforce Einstein Analytics are the flexibility around the deployment, overall capabilities, user-friendliness, and interactiveness with the tools that came built with it."
"The tool is a cloud-based solution capable of integrating any kind of data in the world."
"The most valuable feature of Salesforce Einstein Analytics is the reporting tools."
"The way Salesforce Einstein Analytics is structured in terms of the work assignments and the user profile is very good."
"SAP Analytics Cloud is easy to create charts with, and is a stable business intelligence platform. Easy to set up solution."
"The reporting, dashboards, KPIs, and visualization are the most valuable."
"The Smart Predict, Smart Insights, and Smart Discovery predictive analysis features are quite good."
"I like the predictive features of SAP. It's easy to use tools for an end-user."
"Its user-friendliness is valuable. It is a product for end-users and not for IT, which is an advantage."
"There is a really nice insight feature that I enjoy using."
"SAP Analytics Cloud is very easy to use, and you don't require much technology. It has a very good library and analytics. It is easy to configure and offers good visualization."
"The visualization feature is the most valuable. SAP Analytics Cloud is also very easy to use."
"Improvement-wise, I feel the solution must be more robust since it is not exactly ready to handle large data."
"The product is expensive."
"There are some offerings like Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, and Marketing Cloud that have very useful online learning options. There need to be more avenues for self-learning with this particular solution. That would be useful."
"The product is natively integrated into the Salesforce ecosystem. You also need a CRM license. It should be more flexible with other platforms."
"I would advise others not to customize because they rolled out the newer versions, which are every six months. There had to be some significant testing and verification that happened. It is important to have a strong third-party provider that is very experienced. We used Deloitte, but we evaluated Accenture, KPMG, and IBM, but we decided on Deloitte and that was a good decision for us. Having a partner who has a center of excellence or experts that could give you a lot of the tips that they've learned could jumpstart your deployment and stick to the standards."
"They can provide more end-user customizations. There should be the possibility for the end-users to change some elements in the interface. I have a way of doing my job. My colleague may have his own way of doing his job. If I ask for a change, it'll change for everyone. It'll be good to have some end-user personalizations. I can't see many in Salesforce right now."
"If a user leaves your organization, you shouldn't lose the visibility of all of the records."
"All of the timesheets and appraisal management I have not been happy with. There should be some improvements. For example, as a management team, our managers do not have access to see a summary report, such as who is on leave today or how many hours each person logged in. You have to get into individual users and see. You cannot see a summary report, the reporting is missing. There should improve the reports."
"Could be more user-friendly; somewhat complicated to use."
"SAP Analytics cloud needs better exporting options."
"They need a better scalability rate."
"I expect more integration from SAP Analytics Cloud."
"There is no direct connector from SAP to Redshift, so we are required to use a third-party product that was recommended by SAP."
"I am not happy with the predictive analytics features and smart features offered by the product, making them areas where improvements are required."
"One potential improvement is how we can transpose data. With SAP, if you have data from one system with a declared data type and a different system with another data type, the transfer is tricky."
"What could be improved in SAP Analytics Cloud is integration, particularly in terms of extracting data from the source system. Currently, its data extraction mechanism doesn't have good integration and needs improvement."
More Salesforce Einstein Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Salesforce Einstein Analytics is ranked 12th in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 18 reviews while SAP Analytics Cloud is ranked 5th in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 58 reviews. Salesforce Einstein Analytics is rated 8.2, while SAP Analytics Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Salesforce Einstein Analytics writes "Helpful consistent measurements, high availability, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Analytics Cloud writes "Good for reporting but needs to improve its predictive analytics features". Salesforce Einstein Analytics is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Databricks, IBM Watson Explorer and Qlik Sense, whereas SAP Analytics Cloud is most compared with SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, Tableau, IBM Planning Analytics, Microsoft Power BI and Alteryx. See our SAP Analytics Cloud vs. Salesforce Einstein Analytics report.
See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.
We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
