We performed a comparison between Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost."
"I am very satisfied with the customer service/technical support."
"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time."
"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse integrates beautifully with other Microsoft ecosystem products."
"We are able to monitor daily jobs, so if there is anything that needs to be done then we can do it."
"The most valuable feature for me is querying."
"The solution has been reliable."
"It is a very stable database."
"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."
"A robust and efficient product."
"Data modeling is a valuable feature."
"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."
"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."
"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."
"It is a robust system."
"If the database is large with a lot of columns then it is difficult to clean the data."
"I think that the error messages need to be made more specific."
"The query is slow if we don't optimize it."
"The product does not have all of the features that the native products have."
"The only issue with the product is that the process is very slow when we have a huge amount of data."
"We find the cost of the solution to be a little high."
"The product must provide more frequent updates."
"It could offer more development across the solution."
"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."
"Design and modeling could be simplified."
"The product could provide more features."
"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."
"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."
"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."
"The program is difficult to learn to use"
More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is ranked 15th in Data Warehouse with 9 reviews. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6, while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse writes "Powerful solution with good security and audit procedure features". Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake and VMware Tanzu Greenplum, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is most compared with SAP BW4HANA and SAP Business Warehouse. See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
