We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"SASE's most valuable features are proxy and content filtering."
"The Live Logs are a cool feature. We can directly identify issues and divert user traffic."
"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once."
"The product's most valuable features are cloud-based services and secure internet access. We don't have to set up any physical appliances."
"What I find most valuable in Zscaler Private Access is that it's a VPN. Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the CASB solutions, which is protecting their Office 365."
"The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is we do not have to connect to a VPN, it is seamless. It is more convenient for us because we use one agent to cover the internet and VPN access."
"It is straightforward to set up."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
"We often face performance and latency issues with Zscaler SASE."
"We'd like to have two-factor authentication that is quite simple."
"Zscaler Private Access could improve by improving external access. If external parties want to access locally to my company's services, we need to onboard them into our domain, otherwise, it doesn't work. Additionally, if their company also has Zscaler Private Access, then it doesn't work. They need to log in with our domain ID, not their company ID."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration."
"There could be more DLP-related features. Additionally, there needs to be flexibility for integrating ISP features."
"It has a limitation, if you are creating a rule or something for a web application or something, you could only add five users, not more than that. Five or four users are only included in a rule. If you want to create a rule for more than five or four users, you have to go through other methods, not particularly with the application. Working within the application with this method would be quite easy as compared to listing a URL or a normal IP address."
"Setup is a bit complex because there are many steps that need to be taken before onboarding and activating the solution."
"Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security."
Earn 20 points
SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. SecureLink is rated 7.0, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cloudflare Access and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
