We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, OneTrust and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"The product is easy to use."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"It can have more integration."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The stability has room for improvement."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
