We performed a comparison between Spirent CyberFlood and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CyberFlood is flexible."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"The innovative features offered by Veracode are excellent."
"Provides the capability to track remediation and the handling of identified vulnerabilities."
"Informs me of code security vulnerabilities. Bamboo build automation with Veracode API calls are used."
"I don't have to have a team of developers behind me that keep up with all the latest threats because the subscription service they provide for me does that."
"One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important."
"What we found most valuable in Veracode is the ability to do automatic scans of our software. We've incorporated the solution into our SDLC process, so we take our builds before they get released and put them through scans to ensure any new vulnerabilities haven't occurred."
"The recommendations and frequent updates are the most valuable features of Veracode."
"Our development team use this solution for static code analysis and pen testing."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"It needs more timely support for newer languages and framework versions."
"The UI is not user-friendly and can be improved."
"I've found that Veracode is not particularly suitable for Dynamic Application Security Testing."
"The triage indicator was kind of hard to find. It's a very small arrow and I had no idea it was there."
"Veracode should provide more flexibility in its pricing and licensing modules so that it could be more affordable for all types of projects and not only for very active mission-critical projects."
"The Web portal, at times, is not necessarily intuitive. I can get around when I want to but there are times when I have to email my account manager on: "Hey, where do I find this report?" Or "How do I do this?" They always respond with, "Here's how you do it." But that points to a somewhat non-intuitive portal."
"If Veracode was more diversified, as far as the number of platforms and the number of applications it could do in our favor, we would be using it even more. But there are a number of platforms it doesn't support. For example, I know they support C+, .NET, and Java, but there are certain platforms they don't support and that was disappointing."
"The pricing for qualified startups such as Neo4j could be improved."
Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security Tools with 194 reviews. Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Snyk, Fortify on Demand and OWASP Zap. See our Spirent CyberFlood vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
