We performed a comparison between TestProject and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
"This tool has test data management capability along with test management."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"The model-based scriptless automation is the most valuable feature because it needs less maintenance as compared to script-based automation."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Tosca Commander."
"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."
"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"What needs to be improved in Tricentis Tosca is its centralized repository mechanism because it's not as flexible. The repository in the solution where you store the data and the script for test automation is quite an old-fashioned mechanism that could be improved."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"The solution is expensive."
"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
TestProject is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 96 reviews. TestProject is rated 7.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio and Testim, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete. See our TestProject vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.