We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."
"The tool's installation is straightforward."
"It is very user-friendly."
"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."
"Team Foundation Server (TFS) is easy to use, and we have a complete trail and traceability. We also like the access control part."
"TFS’s test management capability without the expensive licensing has large gaps. Users will be unable to access performance testing and coded UI testing capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the backlog."
"It is easy to push our changes from quality to pre-prod and prod."
"The initial setup is fairly easy."
"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."
"The overall reports in TFS could improve. Additionally, there should be an easier way to migrate from an older version to a newer one."
"Access and permissions are confusing when attempting to include basic manual testing functionalities."
"I would like to see the reporting features expanded so that I can see details on the users connected to all of the projects."
"TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online."
"The user interface could improve and test management was not useful in TFS."
"Integration from Visual Studio could be improved."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
Earn 20 points
Agile Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Agile Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Agile Manager [EOL] writes "We have the ability to define common standard procedures and methodologies. I'm looking for better integration using Octane". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Agile Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.