We performed a comparison between Veeam ONE and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, IBM, Nutanix and others in Virtualization Management Tools."Veeam ONE is a very good management product...The technical support is very good, and I think it's one of the best. The response time is very quick."
"The solution is quite stable."
"Veaam ONE is a very good product in virtualized environments."
"It has been useful for monitoring, troubleshooting, and assessing our environment, as well as for investigating bottlenecks."
"The most beneficial aspect of Veeam ONE is the ability to track your company's growth on a month-to-month basis. With this tool, you can determine if you need to purchase more target storage or if you have enough. This is essential for budgeting purposes, as, without this information, you may discover too late that you require additional storage or that your cloud usage is not aligning with what you are being charged. Veeam ONE aids in forecasting and usage analysis, making it a valuable asset."
"Storage gateway feature is very flexible."
"I like the tool's backup."
"Veeam ONE effectively centralizes the view of different tools."
"Basic hypervisor functions with HA."
"The solution is easy to use, user-friendly interface and has high availability features. When comparing it to other solutions it is more robust."
"Valuable features really depend on different projects. We are using the traditional infrastructure based on VMware vSphere. We are also using the high availability (HA) and Distributed Switch features to extend our network and switch between different hosts. The VMotion and SVMotion features are very essential for us to relocate the storage of virtual machines to different storage or vSANs. We are using VMotion and SVMotion features several times of the day. We are also using another VMware product to replicate a lot of solutions to a second replication site."
"It has allowed us to be more resilient to infrastructure and hardware failure, reduced hardware costs, and decreased recovery time from failures."
"The most valuable feature is vSAN, as it reduces the cost of SAN storage and maintenance."
"The ability to monitor resource utilization."
"Its stability and manageability are valuable."
"The main benefit of the version 6.7 is that it makes end-users able to use the interface much more effectively. They don't have to install a client on their machine, they can do it from their phone, their laptop, their tablet, any OS, anytime. It's a better experience for the end-user."
"Veeam's biggest limitation is the lack of integration. I can't use the tool because there is no integration between the tool and the environment."
"I am highly dissatisfied with their customer support approach."
"The user experience can be better, as it is one of the areas with shortcomings in the product."
"Perhaps the interface could be improved, though it has always been fine for me."
"Creating reports is a bit difficult, and you have to spend some time on it."
"Veeam One has its ransomware monitoring, but it's based on static parameters."
"We'd like to see them add more custom templates."
"The support, reporting part and customization should all be improved."
"the HTML version of things needs to get a little bit better. The vSphere side of things gets a little difficult to manage; right-click, in some browsers, doesn't work as well as it used to. I'm seeing a little bit of general latency that we didn't used to get with the thick client, although it's getting there."
"Although vSphere is a nearly perfect product, it does need a little improvement. Datacenter and Cluster structure should be mixed so that the management of clusters would be easier."
"The cost could always be lower."
"Where I think there is room for improvement is in the HTML5 interface in vCenter. What it lacks, for me, is integrating to VMware's other products, especially NSX."
"In terms of what could be improved, we do face some bugs when cloning the virtual machine - it fails sometimes."
"Higher cost than other similar solutions."
"I would like to see the UI incorporating all of the functionality that the thick client had."
"Both the price and the licensing fee are expensive, especially for our clients with a smaller workload."
Veeam ONE is ranked 5th in Virtualization Management Tools with 28 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 14 reviews. Veeam ONE is rated 8.2, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Veeam ONE writes "Useful growth tracking, overview tracking, but increasingly complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers a suite of software components for virtualization including ESXi, vCenter Server, and other software". Veeam ONE is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware Aria Operations, SolarWinds Virtualization Manager, Nutanix Prism and Zabbix, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and OpenVZ.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.