We performed a comparison between Veeam ONE and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, IBM, Nutanix and others in Virtualization Management Tools."The solution is very user-friendly."
"Storage gateway feature is very flexible."
"The stability of Veeam ONE is good."
"The solution is stable."
"I like the tool's backup."
"The most valuable features of Veeam ONE are the backup reports, such as the status of the storage."
"The monthly reports come complete with graphs and summaries, it's really helpful."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the configuration and ease of use."
"I find that the Virtual Center Management, iSCSI support, and VMotion hot migration are very beneficial."
"The VMware community is always there and it is a valuable resource."
"The solution is stable."
"Using vSphere we have virtualized over one thousand servers and this gave us management, cost and datacenter space advantages."
"We have seen a performance boost because we have been able to more dynamically allocate either memory or processors."
"This solution is very stable. It's scalable and simple to set up."
"Tech support is very knowledgeable."
"It cuts down on hardware costs by being able to virtualize multiple hardware and multiple machines on a single piece of hardware."
"I face difficulties when trying to deploy Veeam ONE because my active directory restricts some particular rights."
"The support, reporting part and customization should all be improved."
"The reports are basic and not customizable, making it challenging to get detailed insights."
"In future releases, I would like to see the solution provide auto resolution and auto relocation of resources."
"They need to support more platforms."
"It is not easy to navigate, especially with the numerous reports available."
"Veeam ONE should make available notifications through SMS."
"Veeam's biggest limitation is the lack of integration. I can't use the tool because there is no integration between the tool and the environment."
"They should make it more efficient and stable."
"Integration with different platforms could be improved."
"Get the HTML5 client to 100% parity to replace the Flash client."
"As we introduce the DevOps culture, we need to make sure that the principles and tools used to support this approach can be easily integrated and interoperated with the vSphere environment with no (or less) redundancy in tools and functionality."
"It would be good if the licensing cost of the solution could be cheaper."
"When we talk about the overall private cloud stack, I would prefer for it be a lot more seamless."
"The improvement is more from a licensing perspective rather than from a feature functionality perspective. There could be more flexibility and fewer model options to make it easier to sell. Today, there are so many different options available, and sometimes, it is not really clear which one is the right version or the right model to propose."
"The technical support is not too bad, but not the best."
Veeam ONE is ranked 5th in Virtualization Management Tools with 57 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Veeam ONE is rated 8.2, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Veeam ONE writes "A tool useful to monitor infrastructures and for backup purposes that needs to improve its deployment process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Veeam ONE is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware Aria Operations, SolarWinds Virtualization Manager, Zabbix and Nutanix Prism, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and OpenVZ.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.