We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform."
"We find the solution to be scalable."
"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"The solution is easy to learn, understand and develop."
"It is seamless compared to Java or any other technology stack."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is the support of multiple platforms with ASP.NET Core. Additionally, Azure integrates well with ASP.NET and Visual Studio."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."
"The solution is stable, and it has no issues."
"Most valuable features include code navigation by symbols and document auto formatting."
"The tool is good for interactive testing. It has good integrations and works well for remote services. The product also has features for collaborative work where it allows others to control my screen. It has a good community for every language."
"I like that it works fine and that it performs better than competing products. I'm very happy with Microsoft Visual Studio."
"I like the product's connection with Azure analytics services and the ability to build the model on the cloud."
"The stability is fine."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is the user interface."
"The solution can scale."
"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."
"The caching could improve in ASP.NET. I don't often run into limitations with ASP.NET. More often, it's the other tools we use that slow us down."
"It could use better reporting and documentation."
"The solution is out of date and should not be used."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"In the future, I would like to see more AI and machine learning technologies made available in libraries."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"An area for improvement is the structure template."
"In the next version I would like to see a better development tool."
"Despite its advantages, challenges in diverse cloud environments may prompt the uninstallation of the application or entire development environment for resolution."
"The solution is not really good at debugging JavaScript, jQuery, or SQL"
"The solution must provide user-friendly features."
"The technical support can be slow."
"The hot reload feature is good, but sometimes it doesn't work. It could be improved."
"I would like to see support for rapid application development. For example, if I am developing a new project, I am repeating many similar steps again and again and again. But the platform could do this easily, instead of me. It would save me time. This is something I would like to have in Microsoft Visual Studio, to have it take over repetitive tasks from me."
"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.