We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Despite dozens of deployments across hundreds of applications- we have yet to see a case where AD is negatively impacting application execution or functionality."
"The most valuable feature in AppDynamics is the identifying of the slow responses. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"We have been able to monitor our applications more accurately."
"The best features of AppDynamics would be the code application monitoring capabilities."
"I like that AppDynamics allows every organization to have what they want to see, like for my organization, we're able to customize the dashboard to show us details of what we want to see in our transactions."
"I think the performance and interface are the most important features."
"We set up alerts recently so we can fix any issues more quickly in production."
"The most valuable features of AppDynamics is the scalability and monitoring."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings."
"The integration ability of AppDynamics with other performance testing tools is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Needs more integration with applications suites, like Oracle Enterprise Server or BMC Remedy."
"I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area."
"The documentation and training material have room for improvement."
"One area for improvement is the MST model. It would be more helpful if it could be offered as a managed service provider model with more multi-tenancy and features."
"The training on the dashboards that is provided could be a little bit better, as could the use cases. They should have some good examples out there. As it is right now, I had to scour YouTube to find some stuff."
"The worst part is that the AppDynamics SaaS Environment has a lot of downtimes, and AppDynamics, despite our efforts, does not give us any feedback on these downtimes/incidents."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 153 reviews while TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.