We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."That visual representation’s been really good, also the overhead that AppDynamics creates is quite small. We've tried Dynatrace in the past. Some of the applications didn't work as well with Dynatrace."
"The solution helps us save a lot of time on certain tasks."
"The most valuable features of AppDynamics is the scalability and monitoring."
"It allows us to configure health rules so that we can, based on our own experience, determine when an application is behaving incorrectly."
"This solution is easy to use and very powerful, it is a complete tool for us."
"It gives me the ability to trace logs between transactions, for example, a DB transaction or JVM transaction from one hub to the other. I can easily find out where the problem is or where the bottleneck of the issues lies."
"We previously had an operations team continuously monitoring applications. Now, they just have set things up and our developers can monitor, view, and act on them, accordingly."
"I have found the main feature of the solution to be its ability to analyze an application's code to see where there are issues. Additionally, it is easy to use and configure."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"One area for improvement is the MST model. It would be more helpful if it could be offered as a managed service provider model with more multi-tenancy and features."
"We would love to see support for more types of agents in the mainframe world."
"The integration ability of AppDynamics with other performance testing tools is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"SQL statement monitoring"
"The overall performance of this solution could be improved. The hot-hot infrastructure features could also be improved."
"There could be some improvement in the constructions of the diagrams, it is too difficult currently."
"This solution is expensive."
"There are many KPIs that are not available in AppDynamics."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 24 reviews while TruView is ranked 53rd in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Good tracing capabilities and helpful technical support but needs better analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "Efficient monitoring, data visibility and easy overview of all data on a single view". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor and Zabbix.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.